The Company we keep can say a lot about us.
How much do we think about the companies we patronise: those whose products we buy routinely, those we choose to invest with, and those whose services we use?
Frankly, how do we find the time to worry about ethics or environmental impacts we inactively encourage while holding down a job, raising a family, and dealing with recycling on a Thursday night? I admire those who consistently focus on and campaign for change, but I also reflect that sometimes those voices and campaigners are focused on big questions and issues that can be hard for individuals to feel in control of. What about individual daily actions we can all take to play our part?
We all know about recycling, and most of us engage with it willingly or in fear of prosecution by the local council for incorrectly using our colour-coded bins. But how often do we make sustainable consumer choices based on environmental decisions before we end up with empty packaging, weighing up all the factors?
Extensive campaign or individual actions?
I recall one colleague of mine saying recently that he and his family had given up their much-loved Pringles crisps because of the amount of unrecyclable packaging. Commitments like that still seem to be something that only a minority initiate, and fewer stick with. But what if everyone made that simple choice? What would Pringle’s owner, Proctor and Gamble, do? Could they grab market share by proactively recognising the errors in their ways and launching truly sustainable packaging? Are they already thinking about it? Have they found the answer too complex to deploy in a company increasingly focused on brand management and probably tied up in long-term outsourced manufacturing contracts?
Campaigns for some causes and against certain companies can often attract a flash of media attention. However, the transience of human nature and the natural media cycle of stories means that unless protests are regularly renewed with increasing potency, they become a short-term nuisance and have little impact on day-to-day activity. This is often the defence of the disruptive protester who claims that there is a need to increase and escalate toward civil disobedient activities to attract attention. That, as we can currently see with the Just Stop Oil campaign, can often backfire and turn people away from the underlying message.
So what am I going to do?
Well, as a newly early retired ex-member of the rat race, it occurred to me that rather than simply being part of the post-COVID generation of economically inactive 50-somethings, perhaps now I do have time to take a closer look and share, through some irregular musings, those things I discover and the choices that I can now make, given the time to lift my head.
To do that, I intend to use my now under-deployed professional skills to examine the wealth of information, claims and hard evidence associated with companies we all engage with, knowingly or otherwise. I want to discover what day-to-day choices and actions can make a difference to the environment, our health, equality and ethical practices. I want to find which companies are succeeding in making a difference, or at least proactively and sensibly trying to move things along rather than green-washing their products and activities.
Having recently retired from a 30-year career as an advisor and auditor to various international companies and boards of directors, I am keen to find a way to utilise that experience. I know how to challenge and research the facts behind the strap lines. I know my way around financial statements and company annual reports. I understand how boards think about issues (or don’t think about them but worry about regulation and compliance). I know how little rigour often goes into compiling the ever-increasing mountain of non-financial metrics required by corporate disclosure regulations.
So, where to start? Well, it would seem that the answer came to me in the shower this morning……I’ll be back in a little while to share more on that.